On Saturday, April 6, 2024 11:35:56 AM EDT Fr Cyrille wrote: > Hello I'm coming back to you so that we can really decide on a solution > to this problem. > Is it so difficult to agree? It's such a shame to have unusable modules > with strong numbers just for convenience. > So I ask again, is the solution with H for the Hebrew numbers and G for > the Greek ones satisfactory and can we therefore go in that direction? > If so, I'll take care of the modules and inform those responsible as far > as possible. > As Karl and Michael have already given their opinion and Michael is the > one in charge of the most modules, for my part if nobody reacts, it > seems to me that we should accept their de facto opinion. > The idea of agreeing with the usfm format seems to me to be a relevant > opinion that we should take into account. > If someone could document this decision on the wiki, that would be great.
As a developer of a new front-end I would also be very interested in coming up with a unified way of searching for Strong's numbers in texts that have them encoded. I was actually just considering ways to do a "strongs" command in BIBISH, that would search for occurrences of a given Strong's number in the selected module (assuming the module has that feature) _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
