Hi there !

I am confused.
Morphological code are about grammar parsing, not about lexicon entry.

Looking at the Byz and KJV module:
diatheke -b Byz -o mn -f FMT_OSIS -k Mark 1:1

For the first word with the Byz module:
<w lemma="strong:G746" morph="robinson:N-NSF" savlm="strong:G746">αρχη</w>

I have a the following output with the KJV module:
<w lemma="strong:G746" morph="robinson:N-NSF" savlm="strong:G746
lemma.TR:αρχη" src="1">The beginning</w>

Same strong number, (G746), same morph code (robinson:N-NSF)

If i use xiphos (packaged in debian 11), I can see both data with both
modules (after I enable the right click/ module options)
I also see more info for the morph code and strong lexicon in the
preview windows when the cursor touches a code.

What precisely do you mean by "KJV seems to me to use the morphology
of the numbers of Strong." ?

On Sat, 18 Jun 2022 at 19:34, Fr Cyrille <fr.cyri...@tiberiade.be> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I would like to share here a problem on some module. I would like to have 
> your opinion on the matter.
> Rwebster and KJV seems to me to use the morphology of the numbers of Strong. 
> However, no dictionary allows to access it. For Greek I found a solution by 
> rewriting some modules like Byz and adding the links of the numbers of strong 
> in Robinson's dictionary. So for Greek it is now possible to point 
> morph="robinson:STRONGNUMBER". For Hebrew I don't have an equivalent. I tried 
> to match the strong numbers that deal with morphology with the oshm 
> dictionary, but it's way too complicated. I have also for test add the 
> morphological strong numbers to the French strong dictionnary. This works 
> with Bibletime, which looks in the strong dictionary for the corresponding 
> number. But Xiphos is unfortunately unable to read this.
> I would have liked to know how we could solve this problem.
>
> I take the opportunity to call on those who develop Xiphos. The software is 
> really a great tool, but unfortunately nobody works on it seriously anymore. 
> I fear that one day it will be completely abandoned. That would be a big loss 
> for Crosswire.
>
> Thanks in advance, en Cyrille
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
> http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Reply via email to