On 7/15/20 1:23 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
On 7/15/20 2:15 AM, Tobias Klein wrote:
Since we don't have the NAS Heb/Grk lexicons

Actually, we (well, I) do...which is why I could explain your difficulty, after all.

I just moved them from my private repo to the Xiphos repo.  Feel free to refresh and install.

Troy and I discussed making them available a little while ago, but we never got to a concrete point.  At least for now, they're available there.  Perhaps we'll decide to move them a different repo sometime, but he may want to regenerate them as, say, TEI rather than the ThML in which they're currently encoded.

Normalization of NASB's references might still be a good idea, but Lockman may well have something to say about that.

Thank you! :) I didn't expect to get additional dictionary modules when starting my original post on this. I just installed them both and started looking around a bit.

Normalization of the actual references in the dictionary module would be one thing, but the search is another thing I think. So for me the question is still whether a search for "G5179" could yield results for both "G5179a" and "G5179b" in case of the NASB. Independent of the specifics of a translation a user probably just thinks "Strong's" and doesn't even know about this feature of the NASB Strong's. Is there any other translation out there that uses these special Strong's keys?

I'm asking all these questions because I'm currently working on a Strong's based dictionary view that combines the display for multiple Strong's based modules in one view. The "standard Strong's keys" are the common denominator here (even though some use a variant with a 0 prefix in front of the actual Strong's number). So in case of using the NASB it would still be nice for the user to have the same kind of search behavior as with any other of the Strong's enabled bible modules.

Best regards,
Tobias

_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Reply via email to