On 20.06.20 19:56, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Names like __u32 do not pollute the POSIX namespace, > but the Linux kernel uses exactly the same names. > > On some Linux architectures the kernel definitions are different, > e.g. http://tracker.crosswire.org/browse/API-178
Additionally, according to the C++ draft standard working draft, https://eel.is/c++draft/lex.name#3: > 3 In addition, some identifiers are reserved for use by > C++ implementations and shall not be used otherwise; no > diagnostic is required. > (3.1) Each identifier that contains a double underscore > __ or begins with an underscore followed by an uppercase > letter is reserved to the implementation for any use. > (3.2) Each identifier that begins with an underscore is > reserved to the implementation for use as a name in the > global namespace. > All relevant compilers should now support C++ 11, > but please double-check that this change works on > all non-gcc compilers you support. See also these threads for previous discussions on the issue: https://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/2014-May/041401.html https://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/2019-July/047252.html J _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
