On Sun, 24 May 2020 13:54:20 -0700 Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Maybe I am misunderstanding, but I think Matěj is suggesting that the publisher of the CzeB21 is telling us that our next module update of the CzeB21 should come from their text they have uploaded to the DBL.
My real question was what do you know about this initiative, and whether we are not getting near the situation, where maintainers of Sword biblical modules should transfer their effort to DBL. Are there any plans to join effort under the DBL umbrella?
Not that I would be any eager to switch there, because just after we finally introduced true infrastructure for the modules maintenance on gitlab.com, I don’t see anything on the DBL site which would help me to maintain their modules.
And Matěj is saying that he thinks their text in the DBL is much worse than than what we are current using:
I am saying it about our module CzeBKR which is fixed comparing to what DBL (and eSword.org) have. I haven’t said anything about CzeB21, where the sources are from the publisher, and yes, we have some fixes on the top of that, but nothing significant (certainly, nothing of the magnitude of the incorrect version of New Testament as it was the case with CzeBKR).
Blessings, Matěj -- https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 3C76 A027 CA45 AD70 98B5 BC1D 7920 5802 880B C9D8Love doesn't just sit there, like a stone; it has to be made,
like bread, remade all the time, made new. -- Ursula K. LeGuin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
