Just curious.
If you did use mod2zmod twice with a different cipherkey, what happens?
David
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 13:50, Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The version that I upload to the link David provided are identical in
> pedigree to the ones that ship with Xiphos. I just bundle them up separately
> from the Xiphos builds whenever I create a new release in Fedora.
>
> The code that creates them is available for anyone with a Linux or Macintosh
> host to execute and create. You would need to install the Python package
> "molecule" as well as install the Docker tools. Code to create it lives at
> https://github.com/devroles/mingw_sword_package. Download that and execute
> "molecule test" in the root of that directory. It will run for a few minutes
> and create a zip file in the root of that directory with the latest available
> release of the Sword utilities for Windows.
>
> The cipherraw utility was removed from the library in 2016 by the following
> commit pair:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r3435 | scribe | 2016-09-16 10:40:50 -0500 (Fri, 16 Sep 2016) | 1 line
>
> Removed reference to deprecated cipherraw utility
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r3434 | scribe | 2016-08-17 13:17:13 -0500 (Wed, 17 Aug 2016) | 5 lines
>
> Removed deprecated (and broken) cipherraw util; instead, use mod2zmod w/
> cipherkey areg or osis2mod -c cipherkey
> Added more tests for cipher and compression utils
> Have all tests write any generated files to tmp/
> Added a clean target to clean up test temporaries
> Added a Makefile.am to maybe help others understand how to run these tests
>
> Troy: It should be noted that cipherraw does continue to have a few
> references in the Visual Studio and Borland build systems.
>
> $ find . -name 'cipherraw*'
> ./utilities/bcppmake/cipherraw.bpf
> ./utilities/bcppmake/cipherraw.bpr
> ./utilities/bcppmake/cipherraw.bdsproj
> ./utilities/bcpp6make/cipherraw.bpf
> ./utilities/bcpp6make/cipherraw.bpr
> ./utilities/vcppmake/cipherraw.vcxproj
>
> There are also references to it in ./utilities/bcppmake/utilities.bpg,
> ./utilities/bcppmake/utilities.bdsgroup, ./utilities/bcppmake/Makefile.am,
> ./utilities/bcpp6make/utils.bpg, ./utilities/vcppmake/utilities.sln which
> should probably be expunged as well. I believe I still don't have access to
> the code to make changes outside of the CMake files and the bindings
> directory.
>
> --Greg
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 5:29 AM David Haslam <dfh...@protonmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Why not just include it in future?
>>
>> Surely there’s no risks involved?
>>
>> David
>>
>> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:26, Peter Von Kaehne <ref...@gmx.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Von: "David Haslam" <dfh...@protonmail.com>
>>>
>>>> Greg also maintains a copy of Sword utilities compiled for Windows at
>>>> http://dl.thehellings.com/sword-utils/
>>>
>>>> Are these also without cipherraw.exe ?
>>>
>>> I checked the newest incarnation. Cipherraw is not part of it.
>>>
>>>> If so, what’s the story that caused the omission ?
>>>
>>> I think it is set as not to be built and installed in the source's
>>> makefiles. You would need to compile it by hand.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
