I did not analyze the <snip>. It was multiple screens of text. Have you tried this in BD? BD uses Lucene directly instead of CLucene. That might have better support for Coptic.
--Greg On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 1:19 PM, David Haslam <dfh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Greg. > > I guess this shows the limitations of using diatheke in Windows when you > have a non-ANSI module. > > "What's impossible with Windows is possible in Linux." > > The test also confirms that there's a serious issue with Lucene for Coptic > texts. > The number of matches (12460 ) is the same as I observed with Xiphos for > this module. > > btw. Did you examine the "<snip>" ? > > David > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4. > nabble.com/Lucene-search-index-and-Coptic-tp4657103p4657125.html > Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
