> Von: "Matěj Cepl" <mc...@cepl.eu> > On 2016-01-15, 06:51 GMT, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > > My Module makefiles in turn live on the fact that certain scripts are > > in certain places so that they can pull them in. > > Define “certain places”, please? Meaning that the directory > structure of sword-tools should be preserved, or that the code > has to stay in SVN forever?
Both. Unless there is a good reason for it to move, making it acceptable that everything relying upon sword-tools' current location needs to get altered. In essence I am currently the only active contributor to sword-tools - but unlike many other parts of the engine + frontends I am not exactly looking for help. Most tools in sword-tools are fairly low tech, task specific scripts without specific coding standards or anything else really. Many are dormant. The stuff I actively develop and use is confmaker.pl , xreffix.pl and some slowly moving scripts around strongs + crossreferences etc. av11n.py by Greg is another typical low tech utility script which, when its time comes might need + enhancements, but should not get altered for no good reason as it does what it says on the tin - and that is all it should do right now. If you want to join that repo, do so. I am sure Troy will happily allow you to contribute and I will be happy too - as long as you do not step onto my toes/scripts by doing so. If you want to replicate and work on things you need somewhere else, do so. I am not trying to be dismissive - but simply want to point out that the repo you target for a move is not what you think it is. sword/bindings is one place you would want to look at and sword/examples another one. I do fully support a general move of the actual library to git, but am happy to wait until Troy decides the time is right for that move. But even then I would continue with sword-tools in svn until there is a good reason for _that_ to move. You have not given one yet. Peter > > > Wrt the bindings and their documentation - the bindings do not > > live in sword-tools but under sword/bindings. Yes, they could > > benefit from documentation just as a lot of other places > > could. But moving sword- tools somewhere else will not help in > > any particular way with that. > > Thanks for the correction, right you are. I was thinking more > about sword-tools serving as "examples as documentation" not > exactly I would develop bindings documentation in sword-tools > repo. > > Matěj > > -- > https://matej.ceplovi.cz/blog/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz > GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC > > Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by > stupidity. > -- Napoleon Bonaparte (or many other people to whom this > quote is ascribed) > > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
