On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Raoul Snyman <ra...@snyman.info> wrote:
> > > >Could I ask, please, why do you not like git today? I mean git as it > >stands in Winter/Early Spring 2014, not some original version? > > It is completely over-engineered and over-complicated. I mean, which is > better, merging or rebasing? Not even the git fans can agree. > I have yet to meet an actual, real-world git user who doesn't employ both, just for different purposes and in different scenarios. As with anything that involves a choice, there will be a difference of opinion on when one is exactly correct and when another is. At least it has the choice. > > People who love git actually love Github, not git. Any tool that requires > another third party tool (like Github or git-flow) to make it usable is > missing the point. > I occasionally use Github but not primarily. Most of my git is done at work and on my own server. I like git because I find it superior to all the other options I've tried (which is all the ones so far mentioned in this discussion plus Perforce). I used to find it over-engineered, but then I understood it and instead I find it perfectly suited for the jobs I employ it for. > > Let's not forget that the prime example for git, the Linux kernel, emails > patches around. They don't do fancy merge requests or use other (third > party) features. > This is not their only workflow pattern. But, for when they do need to use it, it's available as a built-in option. --Greg > > Just my 2c > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
