Version number is 2562, installed from a sword 1.7.0 zip, on Ubuntu 12.04 On Feb 25, 2014, at 9:07 PM, sword-devel-requ...@crosswire.org wrote:
> Send sword-devel mailing list submissions to > sword-devel@crosswire.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sword-devel-requ...@crosswire.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > sword-devel-ow...@crosswire.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of sword-devel digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: verse position problems (DM Smith) > 2. Re: Best Windows compiler to use to make Python bindings to > Sword? (Jonathan Morgan) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 15:23:12 -0500 > From: DM Smith <dmsm...@crosswire.org> > To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum <sword-devel@crosswire.org> > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] verse position problems > Message-ID: <f1612ffd-18f3-475c-9871-953da8ff7...@crosswire.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > When you run osis2mod it displays the version number. What is it? You might > be using a version that does not handle paragraph markup between verses. > > Otherwise: > I think this may be solved in Bible Desktop, where we use arabic numbers so > they flow with everything else. Can you give that a try. You will need to > pick Persian as the interface language to get it to do that. (I know arabic > and farsi are different languages, but we can see the results then.) > > If then it shows properly, it is not a module problem. > > In Him, > DM > > > On Feb 25, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Shane Cooke <shaneco...@mac.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for getting back to me DM, >> >> I see this problem on Eloquent, and PocketSword. Bibles in similar languages >> do not exhibit the same problem. I have access to some OSIS forms of a few >> of those and as far as I can tell my code is the same as theirs. >> >> I do use <p>? here is a sample: >> >> <chapter n="4" osisID="Matt.4"/> >> <title>?????? ???????? ?????? ????????? ????? ?????</title> >> <p> >> <verse sID="Matt.4.1" osisID="Matt.4.1"/>????? ????? ????? ???? ????? >> ????????? ????????? ????? ????? ????? ???? ?????.<verse eID="Matt.4.1"/> >> <verse sID="Matt.4.2" osisID="Matt.4.2"/>??? ????? ????? ???? ????? ???? >> ????? ?????? ??? ????? ??????.<verse eID="Matt.4.2"/></p> >> <p> >> <verse sID="Matt.4.3" osisID="Matt.4.3"/>????? ???????? ??????? ???? ?????? >> ?????:</p> >> >> In this case it displays like (with some pretend right justification): >> Matthew 4: >> .more arabic text 2 .arabic text 1 >> 3 >> .new arabic paragraph >> >> Thank you, >> Shane >> >> >> On Feb 25, 2014, at 2:30 PM, sword-devel-requ...@crosswire.org wrote: >> >>> Where are you seeing this problem of verse placement numbers? Some of the >>> frontends have problem displaying verse numbers in the right place with >>> RtoL text. >>> >>> Otherwise, I think it is a problem with your text. >>> >>> The verse number will be placed where the <verse> element starts. If you >>> put a elements such as <p>, <div>, <lg>, <l> right after the <verse ...> >>> start, then the verse number will be followed by a newline. >>> >>> Generally, elements that contain text and imply newlines should be placed >>> between verses. On occasion it can split a verse. Likewise for such element >>> ends: Typically between verses. Sometimes within. >>> >>> If you have these at the end of a verse right before </verse>, it will >>> cause other problems that are not as obvious. >>> >>> Hope this helps a bit. >>> >>> In Him, >>> DM >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20140225/25fc61e6/attachment-0001.html> > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: smime.p7s > Type: application/pkcs7-signature > Size: 4145 bytes > Desc: not available > URL: > <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20140225/25fc61e6/attachment-0001.p7s> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 13:01:17 +1100 > From: Jonathan Morgan <jonmmor...@gmail.com> > To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" > <sword-devel@crosswire.org> > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Best Windows compiler to use to make Python > bindings to Sword? > Message-ID: > <CAOOKcO7SxQmoNggGXptnbMHnaLra3tpb5=f5xyfacokgdy6...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi Timothy, > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 6:24 AM, rj_qgsous_sword < > rj_qgsous_sw...@objectmail.com> wrote: > >> Thank you for your helpful answers. I had been attempting to use CMake to >> build a Visual Studio 2008 project and make the SWIG bindings. Now I >> understand why that didn't work. >> >> Also, I now have some more questions: >> >> 1. @Jon You mentioned that you used the Visual Studio project for C# >> in the bindings/swig/vstudio directory. Does this mean that I need to use >> Visual Studio C# instead of Visual Studio C++? I'm somewhat confused about >> this, since I thought that SWIG and Python would need Visual Studio C++ >> rather than C#. >> >> This is going from memory, but I think I would have modified it to work > with Python rather than C#, and I think as a result it would only have > needed VC++, not VC#. > >> >> 1. I am thinking that I might be switching soon from Python 2 to >> Python 3. So I was also wondering if it is possible to build the SWIG >> bindings for Python 3? If I understand correctly, SWIG claims to have >> Python 3 support. If I were to switch to Python 3, I suppose I would then >> want to use Visual Studio 2010, since that is what Python 3 is built with. >> >> I don't know if anyone has used SWORD with Python 3. I certainly haven't. > But yes, I would always recommend using the same compiler as was used to > build the Python runtime. > > Jon > >> Thank you. >> >> -- Timothy >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/attachments/20140226/93424eef/attachment.html> > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list > sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > > > End of sword-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 54 > ********************************************
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
