Lexica in sword are not build with OSIS.
Sent from my HTC
----- Reply message -----
From: "Timothy S. Nelson" <wayl...@wayland.id.au>
To: "Chris Burrell" <ch...@burrell.me.uk>
Cc: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" <sword-devel@crosswire.org>
Subject: [sword-devel] Lexical fields
Date: Sat, Aug 24, 2013 15:50
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Chris Burrell wrote:
> For our lexicon, we don't use SWORD modules because they aren't flexible >
> enough. The main drawback was the lack of segregation of different parts of >
> data.
I'm assuming that by "Segregation", you mean that they didn't have a
wide enough variety of fields in which data could be encoded?
> I'm not an expert but I didn't think the current OSIS would let you do what >
> I attached in the previous files, such that you could retrieve them >
> separately. We also wanted control of how the indexing would happen.
Yes, I suspect you're right.
> On the other hand, STEP's datasets are all based off Lucene, so there's no >
> reason why a new 'flexible' Sword module format couldn't be created.
I guess that's what I'd like :). In theory, OSIS allows multiple
indices; AFAICT SWORD doesn't support this.
:)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| Name: Tim Nelson | Because the Creator is, |
| E-mail: wayl...@wayland.id.au | I am |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
Version 3.12
GCS d+++ s+: a- C++$ U+++$ P+++$ L+++ E- W+ N+ w--- V- PE(+) Y+>++ PGP->+++
R(+) !tv b++ DI++++ D G+ e++>++++ h! y-
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
