05.06.2013 5:32 пользователь "Nic Carter" <niccar...@mac.com> написал: > I guess we need to have some sort of implementation with which to try this out with. I remember that trying to create a cLucene search index on my old iPhone 3G was sufficiently silly that I removed that functionality in PS. But I needed to test it to confirm that it was a stupid idea to allow users to attempt it. (I would say the same for BibleTime mini & say that 2.5hrs is way too long to even suggest a user plug in their phone and run it overnight! But that's just my sanity shining through, and I'll resume my insanity in a moment)... >
This statement forced me to check: with BtMini i got nine minutes to create clucene search index for KJV (iphone 3gs 6.1 firmware). Can't believe that 3g to 3gs performance difference can be up to 16 times. Coming back to conversation subject, there can be i didn't noticed too, whether idea with module-supplied-v11n was rejected? Compared to Scope feature it is more powerful flexible, do not increase load on frontend, and finally simple to realize. I even consider ability to provide several v11n schemes for one module, whether it is necessary for user to turn off deuterocanonical content. Blessings
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page