On 5/11/2013 2:28 PM, David Haslam wrote:
Did IBT's programmer actually know that you'd provided it during the period in question?
Yes, and declined to use it, IIRC. We'd used their own canon.h file and they transitioned to our Synodal v11n instead.
It might just have been not used due to his excessive workload, or other factors affecting his situation. If we have Luther and German as two similar cases, why balk at SynodalP? IMHO, the argument against it is flimsy.
Luther and German aren't parallel cases. The German v11n is that employed by a large number of German (and other northern European Lutheran) translations. Luther is a historical v11n for Luther's own translations.
Our Synodal v11n is based on the v11n used in most Russian Bibles and some Bibles published in & around the former Soviet Union. SynodalP was an amalgam v11n, created for people who want KJV book ordering and Synodal Bible verse numbering and also dislike the deuterocanonicals for doctrinal reasons. Thankfully, its disuse meant we could right a wrong and remove it from Sword forever.
--Chris _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
