Chris, I should add in response to your last comment, if you ever find I'm distributing something I shouldn't be - please don't hesitate to tell me. I'm more than happy to remove it.
As it stands now however I have done exactly what you asked when you've asked - so you should have no complaint against me. ~A On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Andrew Thule <thules...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 2:55 AM, Chris Little <chris...@crosswire.org>wrote: > >> >> I credit you for taking it down, but you haven't explained why YOU felt >> it was YOUR place to do it in the first place. 'Andrew Thule posts the >> module on his FTP site' is not part of our release process. > > > Because I was trying to help. I assumed that module development was > covered under licenses, and have no other way to share modules I create > with members of this list. > > The wiki doesn't prohibit the sharing of Copyrighted modules under > development, so it was reasonable to assume since the module itself was > being distributed to the word, modules being developed could be distributed > also. > > > >> >> Yet, why would that have anything at all to do with you? You have no >> connection to the publishers, you didn't do the conversion, and you are in >> no way a part of the release process. >> >> You say you checked the distribution rights presented in isv.conf, but it >> contained exactly the string present in those modules that we have told you >> in the past that you may not re-distribute. You prevent reading of other >> such .confs on your FTP site, so you're clearly aware that this is material >> you should not be re-distributing. But you did it anyway, because you're >> content to act without thinking. > > > I'm a member of this list, trying to help, volunteering my time, and Nic's > question wasn't directed at anyone in particular. He was asking about a > version of the ISV which contained the OT, which I had. > > Why wouldn't it have anything to do with me? Is there something somewhere > that says only certain members of this list can help? Where does it say > only those folks directly connected to the publisher can make improvements? > > Yes, as in my other response, you're still pressing away at the false idea > I ignored the licenses. You still have to clarify that bit with respect to > who can and who cannot offer improvements and whether or not development is > excluded from 'distribution'. I was offering an improved module (and OSIS) > TO Crosswire for distribution by Crosswire's repo. > > I admit that my thinking is limited at times. In this case it is limited > by what I don't know - which is why you've been asked for clarification. > > ~A > >
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
