On 10/14/2012 06:19 PM, DM Smith wrote:
The OSIS schema is a bit convoluted how it allows two different document
models. I've been thinking that it might make sense to have three distinct OSIS
schemas. The one we have now would be one of the three. The other two would be
for the other two document models.
The problem I'm coming up against is that because nearly every "container"
element has a milestone form, everything goes. Some examples:
1) milestoned elements allows for overlapping containers. e.g. <div sID="x"/><lg sID="y"/><div
eID="x"/><lg eID="y"/>
2) text is allowed where it should not be. e.g. <lg sID="x"/>text<lg eID="x">
3) elements are allowed where they should not be. e.g. <div><l>...</l></div>
When these things happen, the SWORD and JSword engines may not produce the
desired results and they are very hard to diagnose.
For best practice in creating an OSIS document, we recommend that book,
chapter, div, lg, l, .... not be milestoned, and that verse elements be
milestoned. We call this BSP (Book/Section/Paragraph).
I think one of the schemas should properly represent this.
The following allow for milestones:
abbr
chapter
closer
div
foreign
lg
l
q
salute
seg
signed
speech
verse
The "rule" is that within a document an element be used either as milestoned
form or as container form, but not both.
The <div> element is funny in that the schema requires that the div not be
milestoned, but allows for milestoned markup. I take this to mean that the
combination of an element with the value of type should be used to determine the form.
Regarding a BSP OSIS schema, the verse element would be milestonable.
Of the other elements above, I don't see that one would ever have to milestone
abbr, closer, foreign, salute, signed.
"q" for quotes serve two purposes: marking quotations (what the marks are and where
they go) and designating who is speaking. The latter is used to mark the words of Jesus. The
<milestone> element is a mechanism to mark continuing quotes. These need to be allowed to
be milestoned. It is highly likely that a richly structured document will have at least one
occurrence that requires it.
Since speech is an analogous form for q, it will need to be milestoneable.
Poetry (lg, l) can certainly cross chapters, but it can be artificially started
and stopped so as to not cross boundaries.
seg is problematic. The OSIS manual defines it as part of <word> [sic, they meant <w>]
and for marking inline text with a type, e.g. type="benediction". I don't see that it needs
to be milestoned.
I've seen one example of where chapter is crossed by div (last verse of John 7 and first
11 verses of chapter 8, marked as "problematic text"), but I'm not sure that it
needs to be milestonable.
Any thoughts?
In Him,
DM
So, would the three models be:
BSP
BCV
Div (used in genbooks)?
I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I wanted to make sure I
understood what you were proposing.
Daniel
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
