On 03/03/12 16:47, Matěj Cepl wrote: > OK, so duly noted ... there isn't widely held agreement even on this > list on this (see e.g., I found in the list couple of clear statements > in the opposite direction ... although, thinking about it, I don't see > anything more natural on paragraphs which are arbitrarily put there now > by the publishers (am I right?) than on chapter/verse structure put > there couple of centuries ago. Neither of which has anything to do with > the original writers of Bible (are there any supporters of divine > inspiration of paragraph marks around?).
While search for John 3:16 might be the more common use case, reading will more than likely cover a section or at least a couple of paragraphs. Sections and paragraphs are the logical outflow of linguistic markers and content. At least for the OT, paragraphing and sectioning is ancient. Like, seriously ancient. Pre-Christian ancient. Peter _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
