BPBible uses its own filters for notes to put the note number/letter in, so it shouldn't affect BPBible at all.
Personally, I've never liked the *x/*n style and I think that in particular *xA/*xB looks very ugly. BPBible just outputs the letter/number, but colour-codes the note/cross-reference to distinguish between the two. This in my opinion gives a much cleaner look. God Bless, Ben ------------------------------------------------------------- For I have no pleasure in the death of anyone, declares the Lord God; so turn, and live.” Ezekiel 18:32 (ESV) On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Karl Kleinpaste <k...@kleinpaste.org> wrote: > To date, we have DM in support of n=X content in *n/*x, as well as Brian > noting that consistency should be supported in that note numbers provide > the common language of note reference. > > No one has suggested that such an update is a bad idea, though Troy > wondered aloud the other night in #xiphos about choice being taken away. > Considering that no other frontend (to my knowledge) makes any effort to > do Xiphos-style post-processing in order to get n=X content into place, > personally I think the question of choice is moot: All other frontends > simply take the null choice, that is, whatever the engine gives them, > n=X-less. > > My inclination remains to commit the patch, but I'm concerned that so > little feedback has been seen. > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
