I prefer Scope too. It is a term we already use in JSword to express what the
module includes.
In Him,
DM
On Jan 6, 2012, at 6:12 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> On 1/6/2012 1:21 AM, David Haslam wrote:
>> For the new config property, would Scope be a better word than Coverage?
>>
>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/coverage
>>
>> http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scope
>>
>> David
>
> I'm somewhat more in favor of Scope, since it is the term used in OSIS for a
> feature we're copying from OSIS. I don't know that either word is
> particularly better suited, based on their semantics.
>
> --Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
