Paul, Those are just three options which would implement the HTTPS, FTPS and similar encrypted methods of access. In terms of SWORD, none of our current public repositories utilize that. I'm sure that one of those three, I'm sure, it slightly better in terms of performance, but functionally it's all the same.
--Greg On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:45 PM, Paul A. Martel <pmarte...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, Greg. > > For the record, there was nothing so obvious as a "libcurl-dev" package > listed in the package manager. The actual package that seems to have worked > for me was "libcurl4-gnutls-dev". Other listed packages that I didn't try > but that might have worked as alternatives (?) were "libcurl4-nss-dev" and > "libcurl4-openssl-dev". I don't know if my (mostly blind) choice among these > has any consequences for the functionality of my build products. > > --paul > > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
