According to the wiki article on the Revised Version, my apocrypha must by the King James translation, since the RV of the apocrypha was not released until 1895.
--Greg On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a hard copy that is KJV Old Testament and parallel KJV and RV > New Testament, put out around 1884 or so, right before the Revised > Version Old Testament was released. The Apocrypha only appears in a > single translation which I assume means that it is the KJV > translation. I just spot-checked through a number of pages and only > observed one Pilcrow at the beginning of 1 Esdras 4:13. That is not > to say there are not others, but doing a simple scan through about 25 > or 30 pages only revealed that one to me. > > --Greg > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 1:12 PM, David Haslam <dfh...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> I myself don't have a printed copy of the KJV complete with the Apocrypha. >> >> If anyone on this list has one, could I have a yes / no answer as to whether >> any of the Apocryphal books contain http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilcrow >> pilcrow ¶ signs. >> >> My gut feeling is that most (if not all) online digitized copies would omit >> these. >> >> It seems to be a generally overlooked punctuation mark. >> >> David >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Pilcrows-in-the-KJV-Apocrypha-tp3473764p3473764.html >> Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
