On 5 April 2010 13:55, Manfred Bergmann <manfred.bergm...@me.com> wrote: > Hi DM. > > Am 05.04.2010 um 13:21 schrieb DM Smith: > >> Regarding using a "real" parser, it is a good idea. But we don't want SWORD >> to be dependant on an external parser. > > What's the reason for that? > I could understand if it would mean for the user to install certain libraries > manually but when the sources can be integrated into the project and has the > appropriate licence then why not? > > > Manfred >
IMHO there is no harm in bringing in libxml or a much more lightweight parser like GMarkup. The build system just needs to be adjusted to link e.g. libxml for the osis2mod binary and not shared sword library. in can be even called a new tool osisxml2mod for example and make it be build optionally such that you can still have full sword dev environment without libxml. Tools for creating modules do not have be linked with sword or even live in sword taball / svn. Although it does help consistent distribution of tools. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
