Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > Quick note: I remember scanning the patch originally sent seeing a > 'new' without an obvious delete. Please be sure to check for this. > I may be wrong; it was a quick observation.
You could well be right, the stopwords patch http://crosswire.org/~jmarsden/17_no_stop_words.diff probably needs a line delete analyzer; added to the group of deletes, after the existing line delete an; Matthew: Do you agree with this proposed patch to your patch? :) > I do appreciate and plan to incorporate Matthew's suggestions into > svn head. I believe I still may research clucene and see if we can > use our UTF-16 or 32 conversion routines so we won't need to allocate > 1 meg of static buffer. Considering all the comments recently about > bc and index versioning as well. We need to release a 1.6.1 soon and > it should contain most of these things. Sounds good to me. I'm not trying to push you along, at all (though I'd be happy to see a 1.6.1 release, especially if it has some working test suites and ideally some utility regression tests in it!). I'm just trying to see if we can get some known bugs in the 1.6.0 codebase fixed in our SWORD packages before Ubuntu Karmic goes out the door -- otherwise the fixes won't officially be in Ubuntu for yet another six months. Seeing xiphos segfault and die when you search for the word "is" ... well, it just doesn't feel good :) Jonathan _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
