Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
2. We need to support http.
3. We don't need to support the old, standard non-zipped directory
structure with http because it's not needed for backwards compatibility.
I think Troy's argument is right for module libraries, created by people
who do not have much nous - install sword and open up your repo (via ftp
+/- http). So HTTP support for standard repos is of huge benefit
OK, I understand there's a benefit. However, it already requires some
nous to create a module and put it to some file system location, so
zipping it and creating the (g)zipped file of the .conf files isn't a
large step. I wonder if there exist such people who can create a sword
module but can't zip it.
--Eeli Kaikkonen
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
