Daniel Owens wrote: > This discussion about deprecating BibleCS is no doubt fueled by the fact > that it's name suggests it is THE flagship program for Windows. To be > sure, for English (and other ascii-friendly languages) users, it is a > feature rich alternative. However, given that it has limitations with > regard to non-ascii support for localization and module navigation, I > don't think it should dominate over other front-ends.
True > [..] > 1. Rename BibleCS to something less dominating than "The SWORD Project > for Windows." Call it BibleCS or whatever, but rename it. (One could > argue that MacSword would also need to be renamed, but I don't think > that's the case. MacSword is undergoing continuous development, not just > maintained and supported as with BibleCS.) I support this. > > 2. Add a comparison table for desktop front-ends called "Which SWORD > application is right for me?" or something like that. I would be happy > to contribute to this. It could include columns for OS's supported, RtoL > support, localization, layout style, development status (not maintained, > maintained, under ongoing development, etc.), and other items. I may put > something up on the wiki and see where it goes. If it becomes useful for > the main page at some point then it can be moved. I think this is an excellent idea. Peter _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
