Neither Wolfgang's module nor Jan's ThML include any of the footnotes or
section headings, so neither of them are particularly representative of
the VolxBibel or of particular utility to us.
--Chris
David Haslam wrote:
I quite agree!
Their way of working seems odd to say the least.
Everytime they do a format shift in this way, we find another few codepoints
they forgot to cater for in their complicated (and almost unreadable)
SED-based scripts.
IMHO, there is nothing to be gained by shifting from Unicode to hexadecimal
codes and back again.
It is an error prone operation. They seem to be wedded to the SED tool, even
though there are much more suitable utilities and programs available in the
open-source community.
-- David
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
David Haslam wrote:
There are lots of undecoded codepoints in the text! Here are some
examples
from Matthew ch 1.
http://www.nabble.com/file/p21209279/vlx3_codepoints.png
-- David
It is a lot better to go directly from the Wiki to OSIS. I can not see
any good reason to use Xephania as a intermediate format.
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
