Am 10.11.2008 um 21:46 schrieb Chris Little: > The Wiki is just plain unattractive. We've got a fairly consistent > look > throughout the Sword, CrossWire, JSword, & other crosswire.org-hosted > sites. The Wiki is has an inconsistent and very plain appearance with > respect to the Sword site that would presumably point people to it.
I think the wiki is not unattractive. It is light and bright, the color are ok and people (maybe) are familiar to it because of wikipedia. Currently I think it is more attractive and inviting than the static web page. > Collaborative editing often leads to bad edits. There are parts of the > CrossWire & Sword sites that are out of date and now possibly > inaccurate, but edits to the Wiki can (and have at times been) new and > inaccurate. We get spelling and grammar errors that make us look > unprofessional. We get branding inconsistencies since not everyone > knows > (or is careful about) the letter casing of the SWORD Project or > CrossWire. > > I try to read all Wiki edits, and I know I've seen you do > corrections in > the past. But I can't guarantee that I will catch every bad commit and > it takes time out of my schedule during which I would rather do > something else. I could think of responsible people who check edits and tell the editor: "go back and correct your things". The wiki could be split in certain parts where there are more than one who "responsible" that content is ok. > If we want a more up-to-date webpage, Wiki is not the answer. A CMS > is. > Wikis are for collaboration and whiteboarding. A CMS would also be a good idea to start over with an updated web page. Manfred _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
