"Jonathan Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What's Ubuntu's standing on unstable releases? From memory, your > 2.3.x says that it is an unstable release (no matter how much improved > it is). Will that affect anything?
It's one question, I guess. 2.3 is considered formally an unstable series because of some large structural changes since 2.2, especially in the display engine used (formerly gtkhtml3 [still available], now mozembed if available). But considering that Ubuntu kept GS 2.1 around for a geological epoch longer than was necessary, I doubt that a policy on unstable releases is affecting the situation. As far back as Dec 2006, I find in my gnomesword-developers archives some discussion regarding why Ubuntu couldn't keep a consistent Sword lib alongside a recent GS. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
