Mmital & others,
I saw that you released it under version 3 or later of the GPL license.
http://www.swordwarrior.net/
Any reaon to go with version 3 and not the still more common version 2
or later. (version 3 was just introduced this summer)
(This is not a compaint just a reason for thinking about it, since
you're the author it's your call.)
Others, does this post anywhere a problem since the rest of the Sword
software is version 2 or later? e.g. backporting/ incorporating mmital
software in our other software.
Regards,
Maurits Obbink.
P.S. Mmital thnx for your work.
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, jonathon wrote:
>> The GPL requires one to make source code available to people who have
>> your program, when/if they request it.
>
> Wrong. GPL v. 2 (which we use) says (in my own words) in section 3: a)
> accompany the binary with the source, b) accompany it with written offer
> to give the source code to ANY PARTY.
>
>> There is no obligation to provide source code to people who don't have
>> your software.
>
> That is not true, see above.
>
>> There is no obligation to provide source code to
>> people when they obtain your software.
>
> True, but then you must explicitly give the written offer.
>
>
> Yours,
> Eeli Kaikkonen (Mr.), Oulu, Finland
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with no x)
--
unknown mileage at least 280 K miles
_________ Maurits Obbink
._____/___I____\\_____ lists-at-obbink.org
(>---_-----------_----\ 1968 280SEL
=="(o)----------(o)---== The Netherlands
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
