On Tuesday 17 July 2007 11:22, DM Smith wrote: > nterestingly, both v2 and v3 require presenting the user with the > license. I don't know if all our applications do this. I know when I > install BT or GS via an RPM, I'm not presented with the license. > According to the GPL, it then needs to be available via the program.
Correct, via the program. I seem to recall the about box being sufficient according to at least, v2 >v3 also seems to require that a GPL program must make available all >source code necessary to build and make it run, including all 3-rd party >libraries (i.e. Corresponding Source), other than "System Libraries". I >didn't see that in v2, though it may be in there in spirit. I'm not sure >how this would affect us. I don't believe it is in v2 even in spirit. This might be part of the so-called anti-tiviosation effort. This also might effect the hypothetical embedded device in another thread depending on what's called a "system library" _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
