Hi Troy. Thanks for taking notice of my patch.
The strlen should not pose a problem, because I removed one that was there but seemed superfluous: -inBuf.setSize(strlen(inBuf.c_str())); So we still have only one strlen. Nothing should be slower. God bless. Martin Am Montag, 4. Dezember 2006 05:43 schrieb Troy A. Griffitts: > Thanks Daniel, > If you take this on, please note: > > Do not include this: > > + cacheBuf[0]='\0'; //just in case len==0 > > > Please see if the added strlen is much of a speed hit. This code should > probably be changed to use SWBuf, which keeps track of len and doesn't > need to do strlen to return size. I believe it was written by a > volunteer long before SWBuf existed. Thanks for any help. > > -Troy. > > PS. My apologies for being away. It's the end of the semester in about > 10 days and I'm totally behind. Hope to resurface again after. > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
