DM Smith wrote:
Someone has ported the GNU diff algorithm to Java (see http://www.bmsi.com/java/Diff.java)
It is written as the diff of two arrays.
I compared the code against analyze.c in GNU's diffutils and it looks like a straightforward port.
I think it would be trivial to port it to C++.

Appropriately, it is licensed with the GPL license.

I think I might be more inclined to use a BSD licensed version of diff as a basis and to re-write the wdiff functionality so that we own it. Even if we go the GNU diff route, we might want to rewrite wdiff anyway since it does fairly little and could be handled better with code specialized to our needs. (E.g. should we necessarily present "heaven" vs. "heavens" as a change of a whole word? Or should we just present the difference of a single character, like "heaven{+s}". You could also use this for orthographic variation, e.g. heaven vs. heauen (1611 KJV spelling) > hea{v|u}en. And we could always make this flexible and user-selectable.)

But the main reason I'd prefer a BSD licensed version of diff would be that we actually have the potential of having all third-party code be BSD/MIT/Apache/LGPL. The only exception, currently, is GNU regexp, I believe. Once we get a replacement for that (probably by using either ICU's Regex functionality or a BSD version of regexp), we'll have the ability to permit groups to do non-GPL licensing from us (e.g. if ABS wanted to do a branded version of BibleCS). There are no explicit plans for anything like this (and, no, certainly no one has suggested making Sword closed-source), but it would be nice to maintain the possibility of having flexible licensing if we have the need.

--Chris


_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Reply via email to