xhtml is nothing more than html that uses all lower case and can be validated as xml.
(i.e. tags have to be closed and attributes have to have values and the values must be quoted).

It does mean that the file is much more parseable and can be transformed with xslt, but as was
noted earlier, the document needs to be marked up structurally in a consistent manner.

If it is not marked up well then all bets are off.

David Blue (Mailing List Addy) wrote:
On Friday 26 November 2004 09:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
There is no "easy" way to convert HTML to GBF, ThML, or OSIS in a useful
and meaningful way. HTML is presentational markup. GBF & OSIS deal with
structural markup. ThML mixes the two, but to use it for module import
would require some structural markup.

It is impossible to generalize a method for converting HTML to any
structural markup language.
    

What about XHTML? It seems to be more focused on structural and doing 
presenation in style sheets.
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel


  
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel

Reply via email to