-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 16 December 2003 04:09 am, Lynn Allan wrote:
> I've read through the GPL FAQ, and believe there are ways to address this
> problem. I'm interested in a "solution" that is not just legally correct,
> but that is preceived by mba's and lawyers to be so "risk free" that
> suspicious vendors will have a comfort level with integration. I am *NOT*
> trying to open up their closed software, but they might suspect that.
why not do it like qt or mysql then? Simply dual license your code. You have
the right to do that since you are the one who wrote it. You simply gpl the
version that works with sword and leave all the other ones alone. That way
you have the mpl for your other works and are free to do as you please and
you can still distribute the gpl version with biblecs (win32 sword front
end).
I mean if all you want is to distribute it. Then simply keep the other parts
of code out of your other releases. It will mean you will have to, to a
degree, fork your own project but from the sounds of it you do that on a case
by case basis anyway. I'm sure you would have separate versions for instance
logos and quickverse( I dont really know any others) since those companies
may require you to do it that way.
- --
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
Brook Humphrey
Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107
http://www.webmedic.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holiness unto the Lord
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/3y2nnT1TkA6FgPgRAhttAKCAsolKk1pV4hQA/1qv3HjbsZnyUACglaod
G2T+X3scsR9aIGX1riDGaMk=
=3+gx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
