> > So, now my confidence in that module is shaken. > > Well, I found several mistakes in one of modules - unfortunately, the > one submitted by me (PBG - now it's being checked). So I know that > proofreading is very important... Maybe starting the new thread "RSV" on > the forum and listing mistakes that you've noticed is not bad idea?
http://www.hti.umich.edu/r/rsv/ Appears to be a better source. I'm not sure about the distribution license though. Perhaps someone could use it to automatically identify a complete list of corruptions in the one from OTA? Stephen Denne. -- Datacute - Acute Information Revelation Tools http://www.datacute.co.nz/ _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
