If you're thinking that we should ship the Apocrpha as a separate book, and that it should be a GenBook, that would be a bad idea. Apocrypha are part of Bibles, not separate works.
--Chris
Geoffrey W Hastings wrote:
Couldn't it be added as a general book. IMHO that's where it probably belongs.
Geoff Hastings
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 16:43:38 -0500 Tom Pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pham Koi wrote:
Everybody wants to have the Catholic books, but no one know or
have
time to spend time modifying the code to handle the
deuterocanonical
books in SWORD code.
Would an effort to make the necessary changes be accepted by the Sword project? I understand that that any proposed code changes would have to be vetted by the project leaders; I'm asking whether there are any reasons why such changes would be rejected out of hand as incompatible with the goals of the Sword project?
Tom Pollard
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today! _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
