On 28-Oct-2003 Chris Little wrote: > Whatever needs to be done, the current situation is pretty unbearable. > I'm guess that any module encoded as UTF-8 is being rendered with Code > 2000--which looks horrible for Latin. Since our goal (with Sword) is to > get all data into Latin, this is a problem that's going to get worse > with time. It's also just a generally bad solution since Code 2000 > doesn't encode all of the codepoints we use in all UTF-8 encoded > modules. (So we're forcing people to use a font that is frequently > incompatible with the module or unattractive to the point of not being > readable.) Letting the browser figure out which font to use worked a > lot better for me under Windows (which, let's face it, most of the > target audience will be using). > > BTW, with XHTML 1.1, the lang attribute is no longer valid. xml:lang > must be used instead.
Hm, I'm unsure whether xml:lang will work well with CSS because of namespaces. BTW, as I remember, URL of namespace "xml" is defined in "Namespaces in XML Specification". -- Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://ex-code.com) _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
