Victor, I'm sorry but I think that you're offering solutions for problems we don't have.
Martin Am Samstag, 21. Juni 2003 16:32 schrieb Victor Porton: > Suppose we have a little Bible commentary for a small range of verses. > (E.g. for Rev. 8:1-8). > > If we would put it into a Sword module (It may be a useful thing as such > small commentaries (probably from somebody's Sunday preaching) may fill > gaps in bigger commentaries.), then many such small commentary modules > would pollute UI (to many tabs when we will have many commentaries). > > Note that putting these into a General Book is not a solution, because when > somebody studies a range of Bible verses he may easily overlook a General > Book (which not so easily overlooking a commentary). > > I propose the solution for this problem which will some day appear: > > Add to MODULE.conf file for commentaries the following: > > SmallRange=true > > to mark a commentary as a commentary for small range of verses (to not be > displayed among other comments in tabs). It would be displyed in a spearate > tabs which would list references to small commentaries (but only these of > them which are used for the current verse.) > > Also we would mark a General Book which only comments just a little range > of verses with (just in ,conf file) like: > > VersesRange=Rev 8:1-8 > > So this general book would also be included in the list of small > commentaries (in that list in the tab for small commentaries). It would > eliminate the need to have a very little commentary which would only > reference this general book. > > Well, it is more for UI software than for libSword itself. So, let's us > just standartise these ideas (probably without including support in > libSword) for the future. Then every preacher would make many new > modules... > > Is my notion for additional .conf file fields good in your opinions? _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
