On Tuesday 11 March 2003 21:09, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: > In other words, the > NA27/UBS4 are not simply copies of 2000 year old public domain texts that > money grubbing infidels have locked for their filthy gain.
Publishing Textus Receptus (not with that name) was at first probably matter of money and publicity. It was published with great haste to do it before someone else. It was very buggy. So, does this discussion really belong here? We could start another war... If copyright is, it is. We live with that. Eeli Kaikkonen _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
