I was wondering... I am a bit concerned by this lack (since I am not a big fan of KJV and am a big fan of the apocrypha - at least for research). Would there be an interest in a new file format to overcome the numbering/naming limitations? I might be willing to put some time into it if there were.
Patrick Thus spake "Chris Little"> : > On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Patrick Narkinsky wrote: > >> Thus spake "Chris Little"> : >> >>> As a side note, Sword uses only .vss (not .bks or .chs) files and is >>> limited to KJV versification. >> >> So, does this mean that some of the verses not included in modern >> translations must be there? (e.g. Acts 8.38 if memory serves.) > > Yes, and likewise verses in modern translations must be combined with > verse in the KJV. > > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel -- Patrick Narkinsky - Apprentice Pastor, Hope Community Church "Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten." - Chesterton _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
