Does non-valid HTML effect the Google ranking or are you raising a different issue?
We do need to make it valid HTML. Some of the mistakes might be mine, some were introduced between the time the template left my hands and reached the server. Most seem to be created by the dynamically inserted stuff. I will try to go through and see where all the problems are coming from and see if we can get that all cleaned up. by grace alone, Don A. Elbourne Jr. http://elbourne.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hugo van der Kooij" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 9:37 AM Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Bible Software Google Search > On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: > > > I was just curious how Crosswire would fair on a Google search for "Bible > > Software." > > The pages have the required tags but .... they fail the W3C validator. > > Take a look at > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.crosswire.org/sword/index.jsp > for example. > > It shows there are some minor issues but also some odd issues that will > result in odd results like starting list entries without starting a list. > > How can we work on increasing the W3C compliance of the website? > > Hugo > > -- > All email sent to me is bound to the rules described on my homepage. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/ > Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, > for they are subtle and quick to anger. >