I have a question for the list: in Heb 5:12 there is 'which {FI}be{Fi}'
... /what/ is _which_ supposed to be marked with?
If I understand your question, you need to tag the word "which" in the following
phrase:
_ye_have_need_that_one_teach_you_again_*which*_{FI}be{Fi}_the_first_principles_of_the_oracles_of_God
Coming from the Greek phrase:
PALIN KREIAN EXETE TOU DIDASKEIN hUMAS TINA TA STOIXEIA THS ARXHS TWN LOGIWN THEOU
παλιν χρειαν εχετε του διδασκειν υµας τινα τα
στοιχεια της αρχης των λογιων του θεου
I believe that TINA satisfies your requirement. Let me know if this helps.
Keith
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Benjamin Norman
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2002 9:20 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] kjv2003: some words translated with a
> preposition
>
>
> mea culpa,
>
> Having done a few chapters since this verse and having reviewed my Greek
> grammar book for exactly this question: 'than' should go with the
> genitive word, as was your first inclination :). I will change this,
> thanks for bringing that to my attention. I would be interested in any
> further issues in my proofing of Hebrews so if you want something more
> to do, why not second proof any green chapters on the status page?
> (hopefully you won't find much more in mine after chapter 2 but if you
> do so much the better, I can be humble about it O:)
>
> LIST READERS WANTING TO HELP WITH KJV2003:
> This goes for all you other lurkers out there not feeling able to take
> responsibility for a whole book or chapter. The Greek to English leaves
> a lot of room for discussion and I don't mind being peer reviewed :)
> especially if it means a better more useful tool for others, in fact I
> want it. I have second guessed myself much along the way (ie should
> non-declined words like the Hebrew words in Greek {like melchisedek} be
> tagged with English prepositions like 'of'... which later examples
> indicates yes, otherwise you get into strange situations) ... if you
> want to review and document the norms we all are using for use in the
> guidelines to help others while you are at it /even better/!
>
> I have a question for the list: in Heb 5:12 there is 'which {FI}be{Fi}'
> ... /what/ is _which_ supposed to be marked with? Nothing I tried to
> match it to with seemed right, and I left it unmarked until further
> inspiration. So far it has stumped Troy and myself (sorry Troy ;).
>
> humbly yours,
> Benjamin
>
>
> Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> > I noticed that in Heb 1:4 "kreittoon toon aggeloon" is tagged so that
> > "kreittoon" is "better than" and "toon aggeloon" is "the angels". First
> > I thought that it was a mistake. After all "than" is included only when
> > the substantive is in genitive. but then I noticed I have a similar
> > problem in Jude. In v. 24 "katenoopion" is "in the presence of" even in
> > the dictionary. However, "of" belongs to it only in some circumstances
> > and thus would belong to "glory".
> >
> > So, which one is better? I would add "of" to "glory".
> >
> > Sincerely Yours,
> > Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Suomi Finland
> >
> >
>
