> Thus spake "Daniel Russell"> :
>
> unlikely to volunteer to work on one. I do feel "an itch" for an aspirated
> Westcott-Hort with UBS4 variants (contrary to popular belief, Paleographers
> think that the earliest Greek texts WERE aspirated, just not accented), so I
Thank you for info Patrick, this is important. Was thin and thick aspirations
different 2000 years ago? I guess that no as (in modern typography variant)
one needs good enough eyes to differenciate these, do I guess rightly?
OK, I for aspiration. Is it enough, Patrick, a "generalized aspiration" (with
no difference between thin and thick)?
What was position of subscript iota in the most ancient texts (none,
subscript, or normal?) Well, seemingly I already asked it somewhere some
months ago, but my memory...
Well, accordingly to your info (devil worked much to make infos on such
question from different sources different) was in the most ancient manuscripts
proper names capitalized?
P.S. See my other letter for a great idea for Sword project unrelated to this
discussion.
--
Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
