true, to be honest I never got around to adding one as I wasn't sure what to call it ;) Would BibleCS be fine?
Talking of wishlists and bug reports, I reckon it would be a lot easier to keep track of things if we kept a proper list of bugs somewhere, and have a standard procedure for processing them. We have the sourceforge bug tracker on www.sf.net/projects/sword but IMHO it is a pain to use (people send reports anonymously so it's hard to interact with them unless they keep looking at the page). How would testers like to report bugs - post to sword-devel post to sword-bugs use the sourceforge system design a way to use the wiki install and use a dedicated bug tracking system on crosswire like bugzilla (web based) or like debianbugtracker (email based) other options? what do you think? please edit the wiki http://sword.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Swordapi/BugReports or reply and I'll add your comments to the wiki btw I'll add my yea to how 1.5.4rc2 is looking :) Regards, Daniel On 3 Sep 2002 at 20:21, Christian Renz sent forth the message: > Looking at the Wiki the other day, I noticed we don't have a BibleCS > section. Can we have one? > > I think it would be nice to have some brainstorming going on there to > find out what the current roadmap for sword is. Sort of like everybody > posting his wishlist for sword 1.5.5. > > Gretings, > Christian > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.web42.com/crenz/ - http://www.web42.com/ > > "Christ never meant that we were to remain children in intelligence: on > the contrary, He told us to be not only 'as harmless as doves' but > also 'as wise as serpents.' He wants a child's heart, but a grown-up's > head." -- C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity
