Okay... but my client itself doesn't have to be GPLed? I have to make the source available under one of the compatible licenses.
And I don't need to write "GPL" all over my software, right? If the source is available under GPL, do the binaries have to state that? Just curious about this stuff. While I could probably take the modules and knowledge of how Sword works (slowly gaining) and write something from scratch with whatever license I like, I'm not planning to do that. I would certainly like the help of the community to localize the application and of course improve the Sword API (such as searching performance). - n8 >Since Sword is GPL, works that use it must also be GPL-compatible. See >a list of acceptable licenses here: >http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses. > >You own the copyright to any creative work you have produced, according >to the laws of most countries. > >If you distribute a program that links to the Sword library, you must >also make the source code available, according to the GPL. > >You may sell your work, but you must still make the source code >available for free. > >--Chris -- Nathan Youngman E-mail: nathany at mac.com Web: http://nathany.com
