On Tuesday 12 February 2002 16:01, you wrote:
> it looks like either the the SWORD_PATH or the /etc/sword.conf changes
> should help you out. i don't have a multi-os environment to play much
> with that.
Yes you can just point the sword.conf to your files on your windows drive.
>
> Dan Blake wrote:
> > With these 4 methods of specifying the location of data wouldn't it be
> > possible to share modules in a multi-booting system, as long as at least
> > one of those systems could read the others file system? That way you
> > could install whatever frontend you wanted on each of your operating
> > systems and install the modules on just one system putting pointers to
> > the modules on the other system/s.
> >
> > This would save a lot of space for the users. I personally have a system
> > that boots 4 different operating systems and I don't want to install
> > Sword modules 4 times on the same system. That would take up way too
> > much hard drive space!
> >
> >
> > Thanks for all the work put into this project.
> >
> > Daniel Blake
> >
> >>I don't think many people commenting on this subject know how sword data
> >>is located. We allow 4 different ways to specify WHERE the data is
> >>saved.
> >>
> >>1) current working directory
> >>2) $SWORD_PATH environment variable
> >>3) /etc/sword.conf: DataPath=
> >>4) $HOME/.sword/
> >>
> >>
> >>Sword data can be place anywhere on your system. One of these 4
> >>mechanisms must be used to tell the engine WHERE your data lives. I
> >>don't think we need more mechanisms to specify WHERE.
> >>
> >>Does this make sense?
> >>
> >>-Troy.
> >>
> >>On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 01:26, David White wrote:
> >>>That is why I would suggest using a configuration script of some kind.
> >>>Users should not have to be root to install Sword, and I assume Sword is
> >>>intended to work on a wide variety of platforms, which may have very
> >>>different directory hierarchy schemes. Thus it is important for Sword to
> >>>robustly support installation into any arbitary directory in a
> >>>filesystem.
> >>>
> >>>David.
> >>>
> >>>On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 02:56, Martin Gruner wrote:
> >>>>>Personally I would prefer 3 places for linux.
> >>>>>the main sword mods directory (/usr/share/sword) for system
> >
> > installed
> >
> >>>>>modules (rpms and debs)
> >>>>>/usr/local/sword for modules installed by installmgr and untaring by
> >
> > root.
> >
> >>>>>home directory under .sword for users.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>or at least, this is the way it has to be for debian so could it
> >
> > please be
> >
> >>>>>supported.
> >>>>
> >>>>The problem here is that you have diffenent locations and different
> >>>>installation methods. Once somebody starts to mix them, he'll get into
> >>>>trouble. Therefore I suggest ONE location, and ONE method, which
> >
> > should be a
> >
> >>>>good installmgr imo. Would even be easier than installing a bunch of
> >
> > rpms.
> >
> >>>>Martin
--
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
Brook Humphrey
Mobile PC Medic, 420 1st, Cheney, WA 99004, 509-235-9107
http://www.webmedic.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holiness unto the Lord
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
