Hmmm, well, I have 10.1 running here, and have just installed the
macGimp package (www.macgimp.org for the 189Mb d/l, or .com if you want
to order it on cd), and was wondering what extra things need to be
installed/compiled in order to get gnomesword running? true, a native
frontend would be much better (hey, I love gnomesword, but I'd rather
not have to run X to use it, cause, well, it's not as pretty as Aqua!),
and so if you want some help at some stage let me know, so I can start
learning the strange version of C that they use for OS X... :) or at
least so I can look into this wxwindows thing... :)
thanks for that wchar fix thingo... will give it another go hopefully
tomorrow, when I shall (again hopefully) have some spare time!
-- oh, I'm asking dumb questions, I know, but I figure I can ask here,
rather than wait about a week before I next have some free time to play
with it all (spent my last 'computer free time' getting gimp up and
running, which I thought would be required before trying to get a gnome
program -- gnomesword, running (for it's other packages that they both
require))... :) and this way my time can perhaps/hopefully be more
efficiently used! :)
ybic
nic... :)
On Sunday, October 28, 2001, at 11:43 , Chris Little wrote:
> Sorry about that. There was an "#include <wchar.h>" line in one of the
> files that shouldn't have been there. That was the only thing
> preventing the current cvs from compiling on Mac OS X. I'm using OS X
> 10.0.4, not 10.1 yet, but my check is in the mail to Apple for their $20
> "free upgrade" so I'll be able to confirm that we comile on X.1 in a
> week or so.
>
> My plan was to do a wxWindows (www.wxwindows.org) front-end from
> scratch. Well, I'll probably try to port BibleCS to wxWindows as well
> as I can. wxWindows is a toolkit that will run on Windows, Mac, GTK+,
> Motif, and others. That will serve Mac & possibly OS/2 & BeOS (through
> the GTK ports to those OSes). Plus we'll have yet another front-end
> that could run on Linux & Win32.
>
> If you could get GNOME running on Mac OS X, you would forever have my
> respect & admiration. I know the GNU-Darwin folks have parts of GTK+ &
> GNOME ported, but I don't think it's enough to run GnomeSword yet. I
> don't see forcing users to install GNU-Darwin as a viable alternative to
> a native Mac OS X front-end though. Plus I'd like to get Sword running
> on Mac Classic (which rules this & Qt out, but not wxWindows). As an
> aside... isn't it pathetic that TrollTech, a commercial developer,
> couldn't get Qt ported to Mac Classic, but wxWindows, a free software
> competitor, already has?
>
> --Chris
>
>
"Morality may keep you out of jail, but it takes
the blood of Christ to keep you out of Hell."
-- Charles Spurgeon
-------------------------------------------------
Interested in finding out more about God, Jesus,
Christianity and "the meaning of life"?
Visit http://www.christianity.net.au
-------------------------------------------------
