this message bounced because it was not sent from a subscribed address to the list. I'm forwarding.
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 11:07:24 2001 Received: from mail.creativesolutions.com (mail.creativesol.com [198.51.241.250]) by www.crosswire.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA21063 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:07:24 -0700 Received: from (exchsrv.creativesol.com) [208.50.255.9] by mail.creativesolutions.com with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 15YtRk-0007jS-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:06:44 -0400 Received: by exchsrv.creativesol.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <P9Q9WYC6>; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:06:42 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Joseph Blough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sword-devel] HELP! Need your feedback on XML Markup Language Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:06:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain This may not be a very helpful solution, but here goes. Why have the <Verse> tag encapsulate the text? I was discussing this issue with a friend, and he pointed out that the verse markers were not in the original text. Therefore, would it be okay to use the verse tag as a marker in the text rather than a tag which is a parent to the text? Something like this <Verse number="10" /> is what I'm thinking. Just another idea to think about.
