On Sun, 22 Nov 2020 18:25:23 Peter Rohrer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 21:21:25 Marc SCHAEFER <[email protected]> > wrote: > > So far everyone has replied in the legal delay. I sent normal mail > > (and then registered mail when RocketMails played the `it's not us, > > it's RocketMountain'). > > > > If someone knows more about the legal procedure to follow when there > > is no reply, I would happily know about it. > > This blog post describes how a criminal complaint lead to a conviction > by the prosecutor: > https://www.digitale-gesellschaft.ch/2019/06/04/verurteilung-wegen-versand-von-massenmails-ohne-einwilligung-strafverfahren-gegen-schweizer-spammer/ > > I used this as a template to write my own criminal complaint this > weekend. Let's see how it turns out.
I got an answer from the federal prosecutor, unfortunately I was to late and didn't press charges within 3 months after knowing about the offender (Art. 31 StGB). So, if you ever get into a similar situation, don't waste to much time sending letters to the spammer and waiting for answers. I am not happy about that outcome, but there is not much I can do about it. If I understand the letter from the federal prosecutor correctly, the violation of the data protection law was handed off to the Stadtrichteramt Zürich. So, this is still open. Greetings Peter _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
