looks like there needs to be a new poll, because this one is broken. I was also going to say "no", because the question looked like it was asking about on-site meeting only.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 1:42 PM Jeroen Massar <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2020-07-06 12:13, Steven Glogger wrote: > > Hi community > > > > We’re currently in discussion if we will proceed with our SwiNOG #27 > > plans or if not… > > We would like to get your opinion. > > Please help us and provide an honest answer to our really short > > questinaire (will take 30sec to fill in): > > http://swinog.ch/covid/ > > > People be aware: > > If you select "no" on the first page ("Would you like to have a..."), > then you do not get to chose the multi selector which has more useful > options: > > - Remote: Join only if there is an remote / online session > - On-Site: Join personally on site I would not join online nor remote - > - I'll just watch the presentations and videos late… > - I am ok for on-site if COVID infection rates drop by this tim… > - Join Onsite, no live stream (otherwise less ppl attend,) if i… > > > I think most people would have selected on of those options if they > could: 70% said 'no' now and did not get to be represented in the second > chart.... which skews the results quite a bit. > > Also, keep that in mind when looking at the chart: 33 responses no, > while 10 of those could fill in the second chart, 23 did not get to see it. > > > I am good with remote session (though I tend to then just watch the ones > I am directly interested in to allow for questions/feedback, and watch > the rest at a later point). > > Greets, > Jeroen > > > > _______________________________________________ > swinog mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog -- Stanislav Sinyagin Senior Consultant, CCIE #5478 [email protected] +41 79 407 0224 _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
