❦ 10 mars 2018 23:02 +0100, Vincent Bernat <[email protected]> : > I am peering with Atlantic Metro at DE-CIX. Their IRR record is > "AS-AMC". I have noticed recently some invalid prefixes: > > $ bgpq3 -4 -R 24 -m 24 -A -J -E AS-AMC > [...] > route-filter 1.0.0.0/24 exact; > route-filter 1.1.1.0/24 exact; > > I didn't check which members of the macro pulled those prefixes (is > there an easy way to get where it comes from?) but I thought information > from IRR records were veted by RIR. It seems this is not the case. Is it > because some RIR don't check anything or just because there is no way to > secure such a macro? In this case, what is the best practice when > peering with such a transit provider?
Those two routes are from CloudFlare (just got it by luck): http://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/search/AS13335 So ARIN doesn't check anything? -- Don't just echo the code with comments - make every comment count. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger) _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list [email protected] http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
